The U.S. Navy’s subsea rare earth vulnerability

The Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine is the next generation of American nuclear deterrence. Twelve of these boats will replace the aging Ohio-class fleet, entering service over the 2030s and 2040s, each carrying 16 Trident IIs and driven by a ghost-quiet electric motor that renders them acoustically invisible to any adversary. What makes all of that possible — the propulsion, the stealth, the strike precision — depends almost entirely on rare earths refined in China. This is perhaps the Navy’s most consequential and least discussed vulnerability.

The dependency runs through every layer of the capability stack. The sub’s permanent magnet motor requires significant quantities of dysprosium and neodymium. Neodymium is the base element in the world’s most powerful permanent magnets. Dysprosium is what keeps those magnets functional under heat and stress. Without it, the magnets demagnetize under the sustained temperatures of operational use, and the motor fails. In addition, the acoustic systems that will give the Columbia-class its stealth advantage — sonar transducers, vibration dampeners, noise isolation arrays — rely on terbium and dysprosium-based magnetostrictive materials. The guidance systems in the submarine-launched missiles they carry depend on samarium-cobalt permanent magnets. China controls the refining capacity for all of it.

This is a supply chain dependency that is far less addressed than the radar and semiconductor vulnerabilities that have consumed Washington’s attention, with materials such as gallium nitride. To solve the U.S. Navy’s subsea rare earth vulnerability, the United States needs a financial architecture of offtake commitments, loan guarantees, and milestone-based co-investment that restores the basic market conditions that four decades of Western offshoring and Chinese industrial investment have hollowed out.

Read more at War on the Rocks