For Russia, AI and ‘traditional values’ are part of the same security logic

Russia’s March 2026 proposal to restrict foreign AI systems, including ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, on the grounds of protecting “traditional Russian spiritual and moral values” has been largely treated as a regulatory story. Analysis from Small Wars Journal argues it is not one. The proposal is the latest expression of a military doctrine documented in Russia’s own authoritative military publications, one that has treated the formation of values and collective identity as a primary security battlefield since at least 2014. Drawing on primary source material from Voennaya Misl’ (ENG: Military Thought), the Russian Defense Ministry’s flagship military journal, and tracing the doctrine’s origins to the Kremlin’s response to the 2011-2012 Bolotnaya protests, this piece argues that Russia’s “traditional values” campaign, sovereign internet architecture, AI restrictions, and external information operations are not separate policy domains. Rather, they are a coherent two-directional architecture: hardening domestic cognitive space against external penetration while eroding the common identity substrate of adversary societies. Western FIMI analysis correctly identifies the visible effects of Russian information operations but systematically underweights the deeper target, which is the shared values framework that enables collective action. This piece reframes the analytical problem and identifies implications for practitioners assessing Russian behavior in the information domain.

When Russia proposed restricting ChatGPT in the name of traditional values, the story got picked up fast, but mostly as a footnote in broader coverage of Russian digital policy. With the right context, though, that footnote becomes the latest chapter in one of Russia’s most consequential post-Cold War doctrines. This doctrine treats values formation and collective identity not as cultural terrain but as a primary security battlefield, and it has been shaping Russian behavior across the information domain for over a decade.

On December 10, 2011, tens of thousands of Russians gathered on Bolotnaya Square. By most accounts, that was the largest public demonstration in Moscow since the fall of the Soviet Union. The immediate trigger was documented fraud in the State Duma elections. But the character of the protests was as significant as their size: the demonstrators were young, urban, digitally connected, and they organized through social media using the vocabulary of liberal democracy, human rights, and civic accountability.

Read more at Small Wars Journal